« June 22, 2008 - June 28, 2008 | Main | July 6, 2008 - July 12, 2008 »

July 5, 2008

An Amazing Album of Historic San Francisco Photographs

I just stumbled across an amazing album of historic San Francisco Photographs on Calisphere. I’ve been digging through online collections of old SF photos, and most are muddy, brittle, damaged. These are in amazing shape and startling clear.

Some favorites:
Market, Post, and Montgomery (this is where the Montgomery BART station is now):

Market, Kearney [sic], and Third Streets:

Mission Dolores 1865:

California West from Kearney Street:

The City from an Oakland Ferry Boat:

Ferry Building 1905:

Street Scene in Chinatown (before all the obnoxious chinoiserie)

Our time is up

Writer director Rob Pearlstein created a completely endearing 15 minute short film called Our Time is Up about a therapist who discovers he has six weeks to live. It's wonderfully produced and even got nominated for an Oscar in 2006.

To be fair, it's initially a bit reliant on some rather tired clichés about patients and therapists, but despite itself, it's disarmingly warm and funny.

The writing is excellent, wrapping up what could have been a series of short sketches into a gently poignant and thought-provoking story.


Link to 'Our Time is Up' on YouTube.
Link to the film's website.

In Season: Strawberries

20080705strawberries.jpg

Photograph from Clarity on Flickr

I don't need to remind anyone that it's strawberry season, do I? Don't be fooled by the oversized yet tasteless beauties you'll find at the big grocery stores. Buy them local and in season, and you're less likely to be disappointed. Want to pick your own? You can find a farm near you at pickyourown.org. Found yourself with more berries than you can eat in one sitting? According to strawberries.com, the best way to store strawberries for 3 days or less is to place them in layers separated by paper towels inside a plastic container or sealed bag. If you need to store them longer than that, freeze them in a sealed plastic bag. Either way, don't wash the strawberries before you store them. Rinse them off right before you eat them. Here are a few recipes we think are worth trying this sugar snap pea season:

For Breakfast

Strawberry Panzanella [101 Cookbooks] Strawberry Pancakes [Amateur Gourmet]

As a Starter

Spinach Strawberry Salad [SE] Strawberry and Feta Salad [Closet Cooking]

With the Main Course

Spaghetti with Strawberries [Cookthink] Pork Tenderloin with Strawberry-Mango Salsa [Food Blogga]

For Dessert

Strawberry Shortcake [SE] Ponchatoula Strawberry Cupcakes [SE] Baking with Dorie: La Palette's Strawberry Tart [SE]

Fireworks in Denver

Last night, the Rockies became the third team since 1956 to win a game in which they allowed 17 or more runs:

  Cnt Date          Tm   Opp GmReslt  IP   H  R ER BB SO HR Pit Str IR IS  BF  AB 2B 3B IBB HBP SH SF GDP SB CS Pk Ptchrs   ERA
+—-+————-+—+—-+——-+—-+–+–+–+–+–+–+—+—+–+–+—+—+–+–+—+—+–+–+—+–+–+–+——+——+
    1 2008-07-04    COL  FLA W 18-17  9   22 17 17  6  4  2 189 117  5  3  56  47  7  0   1   2  1  0   1  0  0  1      6  17.00

    2 1979-05-17    PHI  CHC W 23-22 10   26 22 19  3  4  6          2  1  59  56  3  1   0   0  0  0   2  0  0  0      5  17.10

    3 1969-08-03    CIN  PHI W 19-17  9   21 17 17  4  6  3  97  65  6  5  51  47  4  1   1   0  0  0   2  1  0  0      5  17.00 

It’s the first such game (since 1956) not involving the Phillies.

The "Hockey Organ" 2007

via Gord:
"I was recently in Halifax and was able to catch the last day of the 'arena: the art of hockey' show at the art gallery. One piece of synth-trest was this - link - that I thought you would get a kick out of.

The sk1 somehow had each key hooked up to each player (eg: A=goalie, C#=right winger etc...) and when the keyboard was played they would move around and such.

I tried to sample my own voice but forgot how to store and loop on the sk1 (I haven’t played with mine since I got it – stupid ebay impulse purchase/attempt at re-living my childhood)… but all the internal voices were still accessible." The device itself, and just the thought of leaving your own samples for others is absolutely hillarious. :)

Originally posted by matrix from Matrixsynth, ReBlogged by Jamie Allen on Jul 5, 2008 at 08:25 AM

July 4, 2008

Hugging the Tour, 2008 style

I'll admit to sharing some of Byron's disappointment in this year's Tour de France.

Organizers have disinvited last year's winner, Alberto Contador, and his entire Astana team, barring U.S. podium finisher Levi Leipheimer and former T-Mobile rider Andreas Klöden, as well as perennial Tour scrapper Chris Horner (who I hope winds up a race commentator based on his consistently excellent interviews). Also disinvited? QuickStep's Tom Boonen, the defending green (sprinter's) jersey champion, who tested positive for cocaine in an out-of-competition test in late May. Slipstream-Chipotle's David Zabriskie (back injury) and Tom Danielson (fitness) won't get a chance to show off the team's new sponsor and name, Garmin-Chipotle.

And, since it's apparently impossible to announce a cycling doping verdict during the 50 weeks of the year that don't precede the Tour, we've got a final (maybe) Floyd Landis verdict arising from the '06 Tour and a Michael Rasmussen decision arising from the '07 Tour. This doesn't smell like the recipe for a great Tour.

On the other hand, we've got two U.S. teams in the Tour this year. Garmin-Chipotle and Team High Road, rechristened Team Columbia and arising from the ashes of the old T-Mobile team, are two teams that are in the forefront of longitudinal testing, where teams track a number of blood markers and measurements throughout the season. The UCI plans to bring a similar program, which they're calling the “biological passport”, to all teams next year. It's not foolproof, but it looks like the best way to move beyond one-shot blood tests to a comprehensive and contestable doping defense in depth. Maybe the sport is starting up the hors categorie climb back to credibility.

Garmin-Chipotle brings two American riders without a lot of grand tour experience, Will Frischkorn and Danny Pate, to ride in support of seasoned team leaders David Millar and Christian Vande Velde. George Hincapie looks to be back doing his natural thing in support of Kim Kirchen (and possibly young Kanstantsin Siutsiou) rather than trying to ride as a team leader. And Canada - Oh Canada - finally returns to the Tour, with Ryder Hesjedal becoming the first Canadian Tour starter since Gord Fraser in 1997.

As always, I'll be covering all the action over at TdFblog, where Byron has promised to drop by for the occasional guest post. I've also got a Twitter feed and welcome contributions at my reference wiki, TdFwiki. If you find an interesting link, a news story, or a photo gallery, please feel free to drop it in the wiki.

Screw the Dopers Politics and Critics

Screw the Dopers Politics and Critics

I love the Tour and I can’t wait for it to start tomorow. I’ve followed it twice, and seen individual stages in 3 other years. I know that some people have grown a little callused, or chosen to not pay attention anymore (and – I can’t blame them, it has been a bit of a circus). Regardless of all that I’m going to be tuning in daily (probably more than one showing) to Versus to watch the in-depth coverage.

I think people tend to take Versus coverage for granted, but I remember back to the Olympics when NBC covered the Road Race. OMG – now that was painful. Human interest stories, cameras following only the Americans, and I think the whole race got 20 minutes TV time as it switched back to Men’s Floor Exercise gymnastics. Suck.

Check the Versus site - make sure they know that the interest is still there and support their sponsors. If you really want to help keep the tour on TV - go buy a SAAB or something.

New Muppets video! Sam the Eagle presents a musical salute to...



New Muppets video! Sam the Eagle presents a musical salute to America. (via patrioticeagle and danhacker)

Paying Attention?

When I read Jennifer Loven's AP piece on Obama, which I flagged in the post below, it made my eyes bleed so bad I hardly knew where to start in cataloguing the awfulness. But TPM Reader CO points out a good place to start.

We've seen many examples over the last couple days of reporters egregiously lapping up the McCain camp's nonsensical spin about Obama flip-flopping on Iraq. But some reporters can get spun so thoroughly that they actually retrospectively rearrange the facts of the campaign to accommodate the McCain camp's spin. Change the facts to suit the spin, as it were.

So here you have Jennifer Loven, a veteran journalist with one of the plum spots in the profession writing this sentence (emphasis added) ...

His problem is that his change in emphasis to flexibility from a hard-nosed end-the-war stance -- including his recent position that withdrawing combat troops could take as long as 16 months -- will now be heard loud and clear by an anti-war camp that may have ignored it before.

Sort of depends on the meaning of 'recent' because I think I've heard the 16 months line for some time. And, sure enough, from October 2007 ...

There is no military solution in Iraq, and there never was. I will begin to remove our troops from Iraq immediately. I will remove one or two brigades a month, and get all of our combat troops out of Iraq within 16 months.

If I'm not mistaken he has said this numerous times since.

Please. There's always, repositioning by both sides gearing up for the general. So let's note those. And I guess there's no stopping gullible reporters from getting jonesed up by each sides' spinners to find subtle shifts where there aren't any. But let's not get so bamboozled that we actually start making stuff up. Okay?

Happy Fourth

While the barbeques are getting underway and the fireworks are being prepared, a Happy 4th of July from TPM. Organize and vote. Do it for your country.

Type in Three Dimensions

Taking a break from my top secret Independence Day project that combines typography and patriotism (more about this later), I came across something marvelous that I had to share.

The August 2008 issue of Print has this arresting image on the cover. I recognized that the typography grew out of our Gotham Rounded font, which is the magazine’s signature typeface, and had assumed that this treatment was a clever and curious bit of digital rendering on someone’s part. It is and it isn’t: designer Karsten Schmidt used software of his own devising to give Gotham Rounded’s polished letterforms these intriguingly organic roots (using a branch of mathematical modeling called reaction diffusion) but then fed these digital inputs into a 3-D “printer” in order to produce a physical object.

I’m fascinated by 3-D printers (read: want one.) They’re essentially inkjet printers, but instead of rendering an image using a grid of ink splatters on a page, they produce successive cross-sections of an object by strategically injecting liquid binder into a polymer powder. Taken together, these high-resolution cross-sections form a dimensional object, like the one Schmidt produced here. Print is running an article describing the making of the cover, and its designer has detailed the entire process, step-by-step, in this illuminating Flickr set. Check it out! —JH

A Look at the Presidential Candidates

This 4th of July, America celebrates its 232nd year of Independence, its break with the monarchy of England, and the start of a republic lead by a democratically elected president. In November, we will continue celebrating this democracy by electing our 44th president. Here are some historical and family photographs of each of the two major candidates (in alphabetical order), John McCain and Barack Obama. (23 photos total)

Presidential candidates: Illinois Senator Barack Hussein Obama II and Arizona Senator John Sidney McCain III (Ed Zurga/Bloomberg News and AP Photo/LM Otero)

Blogging Midwest League: Great Lakes Loons

This blog entry comes from Comstock Park, Michigan, where the Midwest League’s West Michigan Whitecaps (Tigers) are hosting the Ft. Wayne Wizards (Padres).  Yesterday found me a few hours north in Midland, where I had an opportunity to talk to Brad Golder, the radio play-by-play voice of the Great Lakes Loons (Dodgers).  Golder, who previously worked as a producer for the Atlanta Braves radio network and as the play-by-play voice of the Nashville Sounds, shared his thoughts on Loons baseball and some of the best players in the Midwest League.

David Laurila:  Before we talk about some of the best of the Midwest League, what is the history of the Great Lakes Loons?

Brad Golder:  We’re affiliated with the Los Angeles Dodgers and are a non-profit organization.  We’re in Midland, Michigan, which is the home of the Dow Chemical Company and also Dow-Corning – two Fortune 500 companies.  This team, in 2006, operated as the Southwest Michigan Devil Rays, in Battle Creek, Michigan.  A group of regional community leaders here, led by Bill Stavropoulos, who was the former CEO of Dow, decided they wanted to bring minor league baseball to the area.  He led a group of investors that were predominantly non-profit groups and foundations in the area, and he donated a million dollars of his own from his William Stavropoulos Foundation.  That was in addition to the Dow Chemical Foundation, Dow-Corning Foundation, and several others in the area to buy the Southwest Michigan Devil Rays.  Ground was broken on April 13, 2006, and on April 13, 2007 we were playing baseball here at Dow Diamond.  The stadium was built for 33 million dollars, zero of which was passed on to the taxpayers; it was completely privately funded.

DL:  Who is the best player wearing a Great Lakes Loons uniform right now?

BG:  I think that Andrew Lambo, hands down, is the best prospect, and the best player, on this team.  He’s a hitter who can go to all fields with power, especially gap-doubles type power.  He’s also a real competitor.  For some players there’s an intangible you see when you’re with them on a day-to-day basis, and with Andrew that’s a swagger and confidence.  He’s an above-average defender in left; he gets good jumps on the ball, despite the fact that this is his first full year playing left field.  He’s probably a better defensive first baseman, but we have hardly seen him there, because with James Loney at first for the Dodgers, I think they see the future for Lambo as a left fielder.  And I think he’ll be well above adequate there, but his strength is hitting.  He’s a left-handed hitter who hits lefties better than righties, and he can go to all fields.  He’s the guy you want at the plate late, when the game is on the line, because he’s far and away this team’s best hitter.

DL:  Who else stands out?

BG:  The first name that comes to mind is Bryan Morris, who was a supplemental first rounder in 2006, which was the draft that got the Dodgers Clayton Kershaw.  Morris is coming off of Tommy John, and at one point this year he suffered some shoulder inflammation, but when he’s on he throws hard and really gets a lot of movement on the ball.  He’s also a smart pitcher on the mound, a guy who really thinks out there and has a good approach.  He’s both competitive and a bright guy.  Justin Miller is another.  At the start of the year he was kind of this team’s ace.  He has good sinking action to his fastball, but he has to control himself a little bit because he’s kind of wild – at this point he might be a bit more of a thrower than a pitcher, in part because he was predominantly a position player in college.

DL:  Who are the best players you’ve seen in the Midwest League this season?

BG:  We had the All-Star Game here, so we saw all of the best players gathered, but a lot of the guys who have dominated the Midwest League this year aren’t necessarily prospects.  The guy who is the top hitter in the league, Ian Gac, who just got promoted from Clinton, is 23 years old and has spent parts of three or four years in the league.  He’s been good, but it’s probably more of him being a man among boys.  Craig Italiano, a pitcher, has pretty much dominated the league, but he’s an older guy who is coming off getting hit in the head last year on a come-backer.  I think it was a fractured skull he suffered, and he missed all of last year.  Alfredo Figaro of West Michigan has also dominated the league, but I think he’s 23.  As far as younger players go, everybody on Lansing is pretty solid, including their whole infield.  They can throw eight different guys in their starting lineup who are 19 years old and under.  Defensively, Justin Jackson, their shortstop, is really solid.  Kevin Ahrens, their third baseman, is a top prospect.  John Tolisano is a pretty solid hitter as well.  A lot of guys in the league this year who are upper prospects, and are having good seasons, kind of fall in the lead-off hitter category: they’re kind of pests.  Evan Frey is one – he can get on and steal bases, and he has tough at-bats where he can foul off a ton of pitches.  Mike Moustakas is with Burlington, but he hurt himself the first time we played them, and we didn’t see him in the rest of the series, and he wasn’t in the All-Star Game, so I can’t give a very accurate report on him.  There’s also Ben Revere, with Beloit in the Twins organization.  I haven’t seen him a lot either, but seeing him in the All-Star game, he kind of falls in the same category as Frey–a pesky lead-off type hitter who is going to steal some bases.  He’s also hitting about .410 right now and is about as solid as they get.  I don’t know if there is, hands down, a prospect of the year in the Midwest League, but if there is, it’s probably Ben Revere.

USA Wins! Joey Chestnut Defeats Kobayashi at Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest!

From Required Eating

coney2008chestnut.jpg

Today in Coney Island, after ten minutes of regulation time, America's defending champion Joey Chestnut and rival Takeru Kobayashi were tied at 59 hotdogs. A five dog eat-off ensued, and Chestnut won! The Mustard Belt remains in America's hands, and Chestnut set a new 10-minute record. Go USA!

When asked why he put his body through this year after year, Chestnut replied, "I love to eat, I love the competition. It's the Fourth of July, and you can get away with it on this day, push your body this hard, for something silly like this."

As ESPN commentators said, "The passions were raw, but the hot dogs were cooked."

Video after the jump.

Joey Chestnut Wins Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest

Previously

Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest Shortened to Ten Minutes
'Major League Eating: The Game' Coming Soon for the Nintendo Wii

Showing Maturity in Enemy Territory

Last night John Lester threw a gem against the Yankees. His 5 hit shutout was all the more significant given his age, the opponent, and the location of the game. Since 1956 there have been 73 games started by young (24 or younger) Red Sox pitchers against the Yankees in NY. Lester’s game score of 83 ranks second only to a 3 hitter thrown by Dave Morehead in 1965.

Here are the leaders:

  Cnt AgeY.D Player            Date          Tm   Opp GmReslt App,Dec    IP   H  R ER BB SO HR Pit Str **GmSc** IR IS BF AB 2B 3B IBB HBP SH SF GDP SB CS Pk BK WP   ERA
+—-+——+—————–+————-+—+—-+——-+———+—-+–+–+–+–+–+–+—+—+——–+–+–+–+–+–+–+—+—+–+–+—+–+–+–+–+–+——+
    1 22.364 Dave Morehead     1965-09-04(1) BOS @NYY W  1-0  SHO9  ,W   9    3  0  0  1  7  0             87         29 28  1  0   0   0  0  0   1  1  0  0  0  0   0.00

    2 24.178 Jon Lester        2008-07-03    BOS @NYY W  7-0  SHO9  ,W   9    5  0  0  2  8  0 105  72     83         31 29  1  0   0   0  0  0   3  0  0  0  0  0   0.00

    3 21.287 Billy Rohr        1967-04-14    BOS @NYY W  3-0  SHO9  ,W   9    1  0  0  5  2  0             82         33 28  0  0   0   0  0  0   1  0  0  0  0  0   0.00

    4 23.269 Bob Ojeda         1981-09-12    BOS @NYY W  2-1  GS-9  ,W   8    2  1  1  1  7  0             80         27 26  2  0   0   0  0  0   0  0  0  0  0  0   1.12

    5 23.316 Roger Clemens     1986-06-16    BOS @NYY W 10-1  CG 9  ,W   9    4  1  1  0  4  0             79         30 30  2  0   0   0  0  0   2  0  0  0  0  0   1.00
    6 23.234 Ted Bowsfield     1958-09-01(1) BOS @NYY W  4-2  CG 9  ,W   9    4  2  1  3  9  0             79         35 32  1  0   0   0  0  0   1  0  0  0  0  0   1.00

    7 23.291 Roger Moret       1973-07-04(2) BOS @NYY W  1-0  SHO9  ,W   9    6  0  0  4  6  0             77         36 32  1  0   0   0  0  0   1  2  0  0  0  0   0.00

    8 23.033 Jim Lonborg       1965-05-19    BOS @NYY W  3-0  SHO9  ,W   9    4  0  0  3  0  0             76         32 29  0  0   0   0  0  0   2  0  0  0  0  0   0.00

    9 24.299 Bob Stanley       1979-09-05    BOS @NYY W  5-0  SHO9  ,W   9    7  0  0  0  2  0             75         33 33  0  0   0   0  0  0   2  0  0  0  0  0   0.00
   10 23.361 Roger Moret       1973-09-12    BOS @NYY W  7-1  CG 9  ,W   9    5  1  1  0  2  1             75         32 32  0  0   0   0  0  0   1  0  0  0  0  0   1.00

Google brings Street View to entire Tour route

Google Maps - Tour de France 2008

Google is taking Street View on the road.

The 3D panorama view for Google Maps is already available in dozens of US cities, allowing you to fly through stitched-together photos of San Francisco's Lombard Street, Broadway, or Ocean Drive in South Beach, Miami.

Now, Google is taking the tech outside the United States for the first time, offering Street View for not just the cosmopolitan parts of this year's Tour, but the entire route, from start to finish. Combined with a Google Maps .kml file of the route, you can fly through the entire route, viewing photos of any spot on the course at any time.

There's also an official introduction video on YouTube.

Also:

Google Earth Blog

Google Sightseeing | Tour de Street View

спутниковая фотография

Shared by mathowie
I love the Kansas one with center-pivot irrigation circles
Земля как абстрактная картина

1
Malaspina Glacier, Alaska, USA

1
The Great Sandy Scars, Australia

1
Volga Delta, Russia

1
The Optimist, Kalahari Desert, Namibia

1
Richat Structure, Mauritiana

1
The Great Sandy Desert, Australia

1
Lake Carnegie, Australia

1
Mayn River, Siberia, Russia

1
Dasht-e Kavir, Iran

1
Garden City, Kansas, USA

1
Terkezi Oasis, Chad

1
Guinea-Bissau

1
Lena River, Russia

1
Ocean Sands, Bahamas

via

July 3, 2008

Why Have People Forgotten River Phoenix?

River1"The lurid circumstances of Phoenix's death boosted him into the headlines, but they also consumed his achievements. He is the forgotten man of late-20th-century film acting. Do the young fans of Leonardo DiCaprio, Tobey Maguire and Jake Gyllenhaal even know that there was an actor in the recent past who would make their idols look like bantamweights? At the time of his death, it seemed indisputable that his reputation would weather the scandal."

- Ryan Gilbey in a 2003 article in The Guardian that I came across tonight, asking why no one remembers River Phoenix anymore.  Five years later, I'm still wondering the same thing. 

Report: Obama Camp Considering Football Stadium For Acceptance Speech

The Associated Press is reporting tonight that the Obama campaign is considering a novel idea for staging his acceptance speech at the convention: Don't actually give it at the convention, but at a much larger venue in Denver.

Instead of speaking at the Pepsi Center, which seats 21,000 people, in this scenario Obama would speak at Invesco Field, the site of the Denver Broncos games that holds 76,000 -- an astonishing number for a political gathering. Obama previously spoke to a similar-sized crowd in the run-up to the Oregon primary, and could almost certainly fill the stadium for his acceptance speech.

Franklin Roosevelt began the tradition of nominees directly addressing their conventions back in 1932, and it's been taken for granted ever since then. But the Obama camp's idea, if put into practice, would seriously outdo FDR.

Late Update: As commenters have noted, Invesco Field is not across town from the Pepsi Center, but is in fact right nearby.

Please, Please, Reporters with Brains

I spent most of today in bed with some kind of nasty cold. So I only caught up on any news this evening. And I must confess to being little short of astounded by the avalanche of press BS I'm reading on Barack Obama's position on Iraq.

The McCain camp seems to have a lot of reporters eating out of its hands since many journalists don't appear to grasp the basic distinction between strategy and tactics. I've even had normally sensible journalist colleagues forwarding me RNC press releases like they're passing on the revealed truth. McCain's campaign actually put out a statement claiming that Obama "has now adopted John McCain's position that we cannot risk the progress we have made in Iraq by beginning to withdraw our troops immediately without concern for conditions on the ground."

I've watched this campaign unfold pretty closely. And I've listened to Obama's position on Iraq. He's been very clear through this year and last on the distinction between strategy and tactics. Presidents set the strategy -- which in this context means the goal or the policy. And if the policy is a military one, a President will consult closely with his military advisors on the tactics used to execute the policy.

This is an elementary distinction the current occupant in the White House has continually tried to confuse by claiming that his policies are driven and constrained by the advice he's given by his commanders on the ground. There's nothing odd or contradictory about Obama saying that he'll change the policy to one of withdrawal of American combat troops from Iraq with a specific timetable but that he will consult with his military advisors about how best to execute that policy.

For the McCain campaign to put out a memo to reporters claiming that Obama has adopted McCain's policy only shows that his advisors believe that a sizable percentage of the political press is made up of incorrigible morons. And it's hard to disagree with the judgment.

The simple truth is that this campaign offers a very clear cut choice on Iraq. One candidate believes that the US occupation of Iraq is the solution; the other thinks it's the problem. John McCain supports the permanent deployment of US troops in Iraq. That is why his hundred years remark isn't some gotcha line. It's a clear statement of his policy. Obama supports a deliberate and orderly withdrawal of US forces from Iraq. It's a completely different view of America's role in the world and future in the Middle East. Reporters who can't grasp what Obama is saying seem simply to have been permanently befuddled by George W. Bush's game-playing over delegating policy to commanders.

Bar-Graphing Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Champs

From Required Eating

20080703-hotdog-chart.jpg

Will another light-green bar, signaling a new world record, make its way onto this chart tomorrow? Will Joey Chestnut, the only American since 1999 to win the Mustard Belt, hold onto his title? He would make 1916 champ James Mullen proud. [via Waxy.org]

Related:
Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Contest Shortened to Ten Minutes
Photo of the Day: Patriotic Hot Dog from Nathan's

My Little Love(tt)

P72801084_014_263_052108 It's a teaser, I know, but I have not had time to organize my favorites from Jonah's Father's Day photo session.  The shoot was a big success--much, much better than his two-year picture session.  How uncooperative was Jonah back then?  Enough that our print order was zero.  What a difference half a year makes! *grin*

Under considerable duress from Abuelita, Tio Kevin and Rob, I had Jonah's hair trimmed the week before the Father's Day pics.  It is now growing back with its original gusto, thank goodness!  I love his shaggy, bouffant hairdo.  In the morning, when his hair is at its fiercest, he reminds me of Lyle Lovett.  What do you think?

Dsc03638_2

Steven Heller Angries Up The Blood

In catching up with various media after my vacation, I got around to listening to a BusinessWeek Innovation Podcast with graphic design luminary Steven Heller on The Business of Web Design.

Given the podcast’s title, I wasn’t at all ready for the conversation that occurs, wherein Mr. Heller blathers a misguided, outdated, outmoded, and mostly pathetic commentary on the state of design online.

Anyone familiar with the history of web design, could tell you that his commentary is reminiscent of what was spouted in 1996-1997 when graphic designers realized they were going to lose their battle to gussy up the web with “aesthetics” and that, god forbid, people just wanted to get shit done online.

This is not to diminish the role of great visual design online. But why do old guard graphic designers have to declaim that the current state of design on the web is so bad, and that it must be thrown out in favor of a more aesthetic one? The web is a remarkably successful medium and content platform. I’d pay more attention to the likes of Mr. Heller if he demonstrated an appreciation for the nature of the medium, and articulated a desire to mix in great graphic design with what’s already there, instead of grousing about clutter.

It’s just appalling that after 12 or so years of web design practice, we’re still having to address these inane views.

links for 2008-07-03

TPMtv: Golden Fleece Award: BMW Direct

The late Sen. William Proxmire saved his Golden Fleece Award for federal government boondoggles but he might have made an exception for GOP direct mail firm BMW Direct -- which takes obscure Republican candidates and turns them into money-making machines for itself ...

High-res version at Veracifier.com.

How Pixar Created the ‘Wall-E’ Visual Style

Fascinating Animation World Magazine story on the steps Pixar took to make Wall-E look and feel like a traditional film by mimicking the limitations and optics of real-world cameras. Director of photography Jeremy Lasky:

We used a spherical lens as a kind of control to look at depth of field and barrel distortion and the optical breathing you get when you rack from things really close to really far away. It gave us a chance to have something tangible. We used an Arriflex camera with Panavision lenses. We looked at lens flares and how to focus lights in the background. There’s that shot in the truck [his home] when EVE’s looking at the lighter for the first time from WALL-E’s POV and you see the bouquet stretched in the background. And this is the kind of thing we discovered doing those tests.

(Via Daily Kos.)

Guerilla gardening - seed bombs (of love)

seedballs3.jpg

I'm a big fan of guerilla gardening - neglected or abandoned urban spaces can be pretty bleak, it's neat when people take the time to brighten things up. Heavy Petal Gardening has an easy recipe for Seed bombs - make sure you use seeds that are native to your area. (I especially like the way these look - people will think there have been dung beetles around.)

Read more | Permalink | Comments | Read more articles in Kids | Digg this!

Originally posted by Patti Schiendelman from MAKE Magazine, ReBlogged by Jamie Allen on Jul 3, 2008 at 05:13 PM

What comes next in this series? 13, 33, 53, 61, 37, 28...

Posted by Marissa Mayer, VP Search Products & User Experience

Late one night in the summer of 2000, I found myself answering user support emails in response to two new features we had just released, Advanced Search and Preferences (at the time catchily called "Language, Display, and Filtering Options" :)). Busy crafting answers about how to set Safesearch or change the number of results offered by default, I worked my way through the email queue. And then I saw it: The next email had just a number ("37") in the subject - and no message text. What a weird form of spam, I thought. Why would anyone be motivated to just send a number? I searched for the user's email address to see what else had been sent. Interesting. Lots of numbers: 33, 53, and then a clue: "61, getting a bit heavy, aren't we?" Furthermore, the date on each of the messages seemed very familiar. Then I realized that's because the dates were all days that I had launched various changes on the homepage. "Getting a bit heavy?" - that one did correspond to one of the wordiest homepage releases we had ever done. Could the sender be counting words? Sure enough, I looked back, counted the words myself, and he was - a manual, human version of a scale for the Google homepage. He was weighing our homepage and letting us know when it was getting too heavy. One of his earliest mails had a note in the body: "What happened to the days of 13?" - referring to the word count on the initial 1999 homepage.

This mystery and its revelation was really interesting because I thought about the homepage, and how to keep it simple, all the time. Yet I hadn't thought to look at it through this very simple lens: just count the words. The fewer, the better. Ever since that night, this has been our discipline, and everyone who works on the homepage and its design knows the current number: 28. (That's the word count for the basic page if you are signed out, there's no promotional line running beneath the search box, you've set Google as your homepage and thus don't get the "Make Google Your Homepage!" link, and you count "©2008 Google" as two words.)

So, today we're making a homepage change by adding a link to our privacy overview and policies. Google values our users' privacy first and foremost. Trust is the basis of everything we do, so we want you to be familiar and comfortable with the integrity and care we give your personal data. We added this link both to our homepage and to our results page to make it easier for you to find information about our privacy principles. The new "Privacy" link goes to our Privacy Center, which was revamped earlier this year to be more straightforward and approachable, with videos and a non-legalese overview to make sure you understand in basic terms what Google does, does not, will, and won't, do in regard to your personal information.

How does privacy relate to homepage word count? Larry and Sergey told me we could only add this to the homepage if we took a word away - keeping the "weight" of the homepage unchanged at 28. Given that the new Privacy link fit best with legal disclaimers on the page, I looked to the copyright line. There, we dropped the word "Google" (realizing it was implied, obviously) and added the new privacy link alongside it.



We think the easy access to our privacy information without any added homepage heft is a clear win for our users and an enhancement to your experience. You can check out the new Privacy Center here.

Crime Maps - mock ups for power of information

schulze & webb presentation on what crime maps might do

del.icio.us bookmark this on del.icio.us - posted by stamen to - more about this bookmark...

Court opens up massive privacy breach in Viacom v. Google

Michael Froomkin has the dish:
I was interviewed today for this afternoon’s edition of Marketplace; of course you never know if they’ll use it or not. The topic was the strange — and to my mind wrongly decided — decision ordering massive disclosure of user YouTube video-viewing records in Viacom v. Google. For a very good explanation of most of the problems with the decision see EFF’s Kurt Opsahl’s discussion at Court Ruling Will Expose Viewing Habits of YouTube Users. Based on the cursory discussion in the decision, I don’t think the Judge read the Video Privacy Protection Act (aka “the Bork Bill”) right. The decision is, if anything, worse than Opsahl says, in that the court also orders disclosure of information relating to “private” videos — videos marked for limited distribution — including the title and information about who uploaded them. While it may be the case that some of these videos are trying to share copyright protected materials under the radar, it is undoubtedly the case that many of these videos are (1) truly private and of very limited distribution and (2) the author would be identifiable from the associated information ordered to be disclosed. (The order also is opaque as to what sort of precautions if any Viacom would be required to take to prevent leakage of this data.) There are some procedural obstacles to getting an immediate interlocutory appeal of this decision, but assuming they can be surmounted I think there’s a strong chance of reversal before the 2nd Circuit. This is only one of the first in what is sure to be a long series of fishing expeditions in the increasingly elaborate databases being created about our online behavior. It will get worse once our ISPs start tracking our every move in order, they will say, to better advertise to us. Video viewing records have the peculiar advantage of being protected by an unusually powerful statute, the so-called ‘Bork Bill’. Many other records won’t have that (although some will have ECPA), and that is an issue which needs urgent attention.

A breakdown of what Viacom was granted and denied in the recent ruling in its case against YouTube.

Because I hadn't seen one yet, I thought I'd compile a small breakdown of what Viacom asked the court to order Google to reveal - along with some excerpts of the ruling.

The breakdown:

1) The source code for web search. Denied, protected.
Plaintiffs move jointly pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 to compel YouTube and Google to produce certain electronically stored information and documents, including a critical trade secret: the computer source code which controls both the YouTube.com search function and Google’s internet search tool "Google.com".
Plaintiffs argue that the best way to determine whether those denials are true is to compel production and examination of the search code. Nevertheless, YouTube and Google should not be made to place this vital asset in hazard merely to allay speculation. A plausible showing that YouTube and Google’s denials are false, and that the search function can and has been used to discriminate in favor of infringing content, should be required before disclosure of so valuable and vulnerable an asset is compelled.

2) The code behind YouTube's identification of infringing videos. Denied.
Plaintiffs also move to compel production of another undisputed trade secret, the computer source code for the newly invented "Video ID" program. Using that program, copyright owners may furnish YouTube with video reference samples, which YouTube will use to search for and locate video clips in its library which have characteristics sufficiently matching those of the samples as to suggest infringement.
The notion that examination of the source code might suggest how to make a better method of infringement detection is speculative. Considered against its value and secrecy, plaintiffs have not made a sufficient showing of need for its disclosure.

3) Copies of all removed videos. Granted.
Plaintiffs seek copies of all videos that were once available for public viewing on YouTube.com but later removed for any reason, or such subsets as plaintiffs designate (Pls.’ Reply 41).
While the total number of removed videos is intimidating (millions, according to defendants), the burden of inspection and selection, leading to the ultimate identification of individual “works-in-suit”, is on the plaintiffs who say they can handle it electronically. Under the circumstances, the motion to compel production of copies of all removed videos is granted.

4) Logs data including the "Login ID" and the IP address for each view of a video on YouTube. Granted.
Defendants do not refute that the "login ID is an anonymous pseudonym that users create for themselves when they sign up with YouTube" which without more "cannot identify specific individuals" (Pls.’ Reply 44) , and Google has elsewhere stated:
We . . . are strong supporters of the idea that data protection laws should apply to any data that could identify you. The reality is though that in most cases, an IP address without additional information cannot.
Google Software Engineer Alma Whitten, Are IP addresses personal?, GOOGLE PUBLIC POLICY BLOG (Feb. 22, 2008), http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/02/are-ip-addresses-personal.html (Wilkens Decl. Ex. M).
Therefore, the motion to compel production of all data from the Logging database concerning eac